|
|
| The world apprehended by all of us, not precisely as it, seems. The validity is, that a material world - only shown effect of movements of various atoms and molecules. Our eye perception changes according to sharp, sad, sick and t.d an eye kind. |
 |
|
The world apprehended by all of us, not precisely as it, seems. The validity is, that a material world - only shown effect of movements of various atoms and molecules. Our events of various objects, events in this world directly depend on designing of our eyes and level of intellectual perception.
If person’s eyes see something in the specific way, it is not necessary, that others also will visualise it in the same way. Our eye perception changes according to sharp, sad, sick and t.d an eye kind. One person sees a case directly before it in one specific way, and other person can test it in another way. It remains for perception of taste also. The person whom any delightful point of food is very bad finds, bitter in taste. If our tummies are full or if we receive diarrhoeia, the delightful food also is unattractive to our flavouring receptors. The question does not come to an end here because concealment of gland of each person differs chemically. As a result of this specific point of food tested by various people, gives various tastes to all of them. At rough level all find a salty salty and sugar sweet in taste. And still deeper analysis speaks to us, what even salinity and sweet has many classes. Thus all tastes apprehended by various people, differ from each other different ways. It remains for our eyes also. The distinctions noticed in designing of an eye of various people along with that from a brain, lead to various perception of unique object or a case various people.
Designing of eyes of birds and people differs much. It remains for their brain projecting also. Thus birds do not see various things in the world in the same way as people do. Birds feel colours in another way when in comparison with colour perception of mankind.
The Russian centre of research of an animal/bird says, that the bull cannot feel red colour. For bulls the white-red colour perception is synonymous. Even bees of honey cannot be differentiated between white-red colour. Hearts of heat feel an ultra-violet shade which cannot be apprehended people. Birds feel only 4 colours, that is red, dark blue, yellow and green. Birds not in a condition to visualise 7 colours and their various classes as people do.
In the same way zelenost grasses it is not apprehended in the same way by all. Our language skill has own restrictions and therefore we cannot describe thin distinctions in perception of colours various beings. If only we become capable to differentiation of these distinctions it becomes clear, that various distinctions to taste and paint perception, are interested, will extend extremely. These distinctions will be related to distinctions between various people, is interested at level of their voice, the person and character. In the same way distinctions exist, how much colour perception is interested. The same remains for taste. The perception of a smell also has such distinctions. Before hearing and sensation of contact it is disturbed, that each person feels them in another way. These distinctions are very thin and therefore though extremely they are not found out, they definitely exist is thin.
The fact remains, that the same as distinctions exist, how much individual perception of taste is interested, colour perception also variously for various people. These distinctions are so thin, that our limited speech not in a condition to express them in all quantity. When 2 persons eat, the same part allow us to speak a pie, their perception of taste will differ definitely from each other. The problem is, that distinctions in perception of sweet taste are so thin, that it requires the measurement environment to measure this which is inaccessible now.
Assume, that our eyes feel specific colour in the object noticed by it. The question which set, object has actually that apprehended colour? Colour has the object apprehended by the person, as apprehended by other beings? The answer - resolute ‘ no ’!!! The Real fact remains, that basically all material objects are colourless. Distinctions in a nuclear configuration of various atoms of objects give illusion of colours. Atoms are in essence deprived colour. Thus the question arises concerning what colour?
Material objects absorb only white colour of solar beams, and rejects any colour of these beams from an input in it. Factory leaves seem green in colour because these leaves not in condition to absorb green colour of solar beams. As a result this reflected green colour is included into our eyes and therefore we say, that leaves are green in colour.
Spiritualists and philosophers who believe, that ‘ every individual lives in its/its world ’ are certainly true if is analyzed deeply. Each person creates the own world and lives in it. What precisely this world? The answer one, and it - that the world - is simple the movements created by various atoms and molecules of inert objects. It resembles a dust, made various atoms and molecules which moves to the directed stream of various types. Here there is nothing tasty, insipid, beautiful etc. We find leaves neem bitter in taste, but the camel finds it ‘ yummy ’. Probably leaves neem - delightful pies and cookies for camels. The validity remains, that food is not sweet, bitter and t.d separately. Only our flavouring receptors and a brain give them various labels as sweet, salty etc. Designing of our flavouring receptors, intelligence and t.d gives us various perception as taste, colour, a kind, smells etc.
The same remains for concept, loves and does not love. Our beliefs and biases say us, that it - ‘ mine ’ and ‘ not a deposit ’. The truth is, that any not our own and, and thus they are not alien to us. In this garden named the planet earth many children operated around playfully. Many play one specific ‘ team ’ and others in opposition ‘ team ’. If it is analyzed deeply these associations and dissociation are instant and still because we give it inappropriate importance because of influence of our sickly souls and intelligence, we say, that things/events are promoting or otherwise depending on circumstances. External events should not be accused, but our weak soul marks them as joyful or painful. The distinctions noticed among sacred and criminals before reaction to a specific situation, are interested, exclusively based on their mental conditions and relations. Thus substantially external events should not be accused for our errors.
The same as 5 bodies of perception measure ours and analyze the external world nature so also, 4 conscious centres of our mind also are responsible for this problem. Thus mind also - environment which tests external events. All our knowledge and the information are reached through feelings and soul. The various states of souls of various people are responsible for the various caused reactions while they face to one specific general situation. If the fact was exclusive in the nature reaction to it also should have one type only. One person carries out criminal acts, and another likes to serve the world as various ways. Everyone other eremite (Tyaagi) loves fleeting pleasures of sense, and. One person likes to sport its achievements, riches and t.d, and another lives the simple life full of high reflexion. Everyone is shipped in accumulation of riches and t.d and another to live a life of the beggar. These distinctions clearly prove, that external events not the original cause but what exactly their various mental conditions and relations are responsible for them. If only this space truth has been accepted by all of us there would be no place for fanatical distinctions of opinions. Our bodies of perception, as is known, misinform us, but bolshy the criminal - our mind which does illusory conclusions concerning external wordly situations/objects.
Pleasure and grief events are very relative. The situation is joyful or painful only when in comparison with other situation. The middle class family is bad, when in comparison with very rich family, but it is rich when in comparison with bad families of a class. The patient who has a cold, has less carried than the healthy person, but definitely more has carried when in comparison with a sick cancer. Except 10 %-s' physical illnesses the connected pain remaining 90 %-s' pleasures and grieves are very relative in the nature. The unique situation does one person happy and other sad. On the basis of the various conclusions made, difficultly precisely to define the truth.
This world is made of material objects. Material objects are made of molecules. Molecules are made of atoms, the atoms made from elektronov, protons and t.d and last, are displays of waves. The modern science says, that this material world - only display of waves and fluctuations. These fluctuations show as a sound, taste, a smell, vision, contact, thoughts, intellectual skill, events etc. There anything except fluctuations does not exist.
Within the Nature of Mother or Prakriti the Higher authority continuously shows as fluctuation which are responsible for the union, give and take, appeal, disgust etc. in turn show These vibrating movements as material objects. Regardless of the fact that it is apprehended by our eyes, is only display of fluctuations at root level. Our soul was based, events of these objects/events sometimes increase or reduction which in turn show as the intellectual loves and does not love. All atoms of live and inanimate objects head in certain instructions after the certain sample of movement. If any so wishes, that he or it could enjoy a blissful stream of its management, related to volume to be set on coast and to pleasure by waves of sea increase and razbivanija on the basis. Only the misled person will shout in a flour when lines of a wave ashore and will follow a board for pleasure when increase of a wave above air. Ocean waves definitely will proceed with this activity of increase and falling. Our business how we react to them. We can or easy and separately to enjoy this scene or to get confused in a loop of a flour and ecstasy with each increase and falling which in turn can cause only pressure and intensity in our soul. Once creation Today’s definitely will lead to destruction. The person who dreams of the world which remains static and invariable, will always remain outstanding. Here the state of an invariance does not have any place. Any who grieves for the invariable world, is in for the sharp shock accompanied one only by force a flour and struggle. |
|
| About the Author |
|
Shriram Sharma Acharya, the founder of International Family Gayatri, was great Jogom, the seer and an embodiment of the God which has written volumes of the scientific literature mainly in spiritual subjects for world well-being and the world.
For bolshego quantities of scientific e-book visiting: http://www.shriramsharma.com / (public relation GOOGLE 4)
KEYWORDS: Yoga Kundalini an e-book nerve of the god of soul of mind of world peace of the Guru of biography Gayatri a thin soul of consciousness a divine trance endokrinnye tonsils ESPECIALLY Chakras plexus meditatsionnoe a prophecy of intelligence of concentration thought, thinking a brain of happiness Cheiro Nostradamus Aurobindo Vedas a sun solar energy sacred pure bodies of perception Embodiment Prana a cell of light Upanishad hypothalamus gipofizarnyj character of integrity of ethics of the person of a life of the power of a snake of a prediction of the futurist of transformation vagus the Tantra a proton of a neutron of atom Mooladhar
The DESCRIPTION: Free e-books on Future Scientific Religion, Gayatri Science and Kundalini Yoga correlated to nevrologijam ESPECIALLY, Endokrinologii, Anatomy, Psychology and Sociology for world peace.
Article source: http://www. ArticlesTake.com/author-yuga-rishi-1332.html |
|
|
