|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Why the Child Transferring, Is healthy |
|
|
|
|
|
| Why the Child Transferring, Is healthy |
|
|
|
| Though the relation of children can be a convenience choice, it - also a choice which has health consequences. Not presence of children places women in risk of illness while unrestrained reproduction limits elections of a life and places populjatsionnoe pressure upon a society and environment. The nature holds answers. |
| |
|
From simply biological prospect, having children can be considered as the most important reason for woman’s existence. In this respect, the same could be told about men, as both floors - actually, accessible packages of a genetic material. We die, but our genes move ahead is immortal.
With increasing populjatsionnym pressure and a modern independent way of life (unlike a family farm where children were almost requirement), generation became a choice which is more and more reduced or is at least considerably limited. But with these elections of the woman take out itself from a natural biological role. In addition, breast consideration as an ornament, instead of eating body – choosing synthetic formulas – also deletes women from natural biological function.
When these elections together with use of contraceptive hormones, hormonal therapy of the replacement, increasing cargo estrogenic zagrjaznitelej in environment and food, and a diet which has turned considerably from its natural project, formulas for a hormonal chaos, metabolic dysfunction, and illness is in a place. Result - early menstruatsii in children, barreness, wrong and unstable menstrualnyh cycles, tservikalnom infringement of growth, fibrous tumours, endometrialnom a cancer, a mammary gland cancer, predmenstrualnom a syndrome, a drama mood swing and depression, osteoporosis, and other signs wrong menopauzy: hot flashes, psychological problems, have reduced libido, and utonchenie vlagalishchnoj walls.
It is a difficult problem without the easy decision. If at women would be so many children as they are capable to, nurse them for many years as they are developed to, eat natural products, and live in more ancient environment, the majority of these modern problems of health would disappear.
If money followed from our signal we would not have economic problems also, correctly?
The desire to limit a family, possibl, fast at all a choice. We or reduce an increase in population, or we will be, saw through a branch on which all of us we sit. The population - the engine which finally conducts all ecological grief. We live on a final planet with final resources, but we have an infinite ability to breed. We or live within the limits of viable resources Earth’s, or we will destroy us. Presence of children can be natural and healthy process, but can be deadly game for a viable life on the Earth.
Thus we have a riddle. Women should execute the biological reproductive role to reach metabolic balance and health but if they do so unlimited, life health on the Earth is subjected danger.
In attempt to solve this dilemma, women have turned to fast inconvenient position of pharmaceutical synthetic hormones. Hormones which operate the concept, hormones which operate wrong menstrualnymi cycles, and hormones that menopauza inconvenient position. It is excessively simplified decision of a challenge.
The statement, “Don’t the disorder with the Nature of Mother” is especially applicable, dosing out a body with hormones. Since 1940’s when estrogen therapy became popular, hundred thousand women have conceded to a cancer. For example, the woman, almost in 13 times more possibly, will receive endometrialnyj a cancer, and almost in 30 % has increased risk of a cancer of a mammary gland when it takes an estrogen. Recently, researchers identified two main predotvratimyh risk of a cancer of a mammary gland: oral contraceptive pills and therapy of replacement of an estrogen.
For those who justifies use of an estrogen for privileges of the reduced risk osteoporosis and cardiovascular illness, believe, that appropriate realisation, a diet and elections of a way of life can have a same favorable influence without a potential consequence of a cancer.
How women have definitely placed themselves outside of their natural context to make themselves more susceptible to cancer formations?
Average mum gives rise approximately two babies. Though it is intellectual number from the point of view populjatsionnogo the control, it is unnatural in it, not continuing to have pregnancy and to nurse (which stops ovuljatsii), it will be ovulirovat improbable 438 times during its whole life.
On the other hand, the woman in primitive natural settlement which, probably, not even knows, that pregnancy of the reasons or how to prevent it even if they would want to, would begin menstruirovat and ovulirovat in twelve years both would put to nine babies and would nurse them during its reproductive career. Feeding by a breast can proceed for children in completely natural settlement within five or more years of age. The pregnancy combination along with feeding by a breast in premodern settlement would reduce number ovuljatsy which primitive mother will have to approximately nine.
It means that today a cycle of women through their monthly periods wrong quantity of times, subjecting their bodies to estrogen waves, in 50 times more than our primitive ancestors living in natural settlement.
Many cancer formations of women are sensitive to high levels of female hormones.
For example, the mammary gland cancer is sensitive to an estrogen. In dogs, simply deleting jaichniki can often prevent or stop advancement of a chest cancer. Tamoksifen in people it is used to block activity of an estrogen within chest tonsils and thus as believe, shows the protective effect thus. (This pharmaceutical agent can increase, however, risk of a uterine cancer to approximately same degree, that the risk of a cancer of a mammary gland is reduced!)
The having a rest periods of lower levels of an estrogen, that the women tested in premodern settlement, served protective effect to save bodies and fabrics from a cancer. Women who nurse for that full time interval, just when at a few as, as is known, are two years the reduced level of a chest cancer.
This superfluous hypothesis ovuljatsii - a probable explanation of the tragical phenomenon of modern female cancer formations. When people will decide to despise and cancel the nature, facing the natural biological project, illness always will be a consequence.
If a problem - departure by nature, the decision - returning to it. Here some variants:
1. Refer to the Optimum Program of Health Wysong for supervising principles at elections of a life which can increase full health and thus hormonal health (http://www.wysong.net/optimal_health_page1.shtml).
2. Underline new crude products in a diet and avoid the processed products in the greatest possible degree.
3. Eliminate gidrogeniziruemye oils and the cleared sugar. gidrogeniziruemye oils move healthy dietary fats and as showed, were cancerogenic, and sugar can stimulate increase of an estrogen.
4. Try to use organic products in the greatest possible degree and to avoid synthetic materials in cosmetics, houses and on a workplace, to help to reduce podverganie to an ecological estrogen.
5. Do not do attempt “low fat” or “low cholesterol” diet of whim which often create dependence on the processed carbohydrates and seriously reduce the important natural dietary fats and essential fat acids.
6. Increase consumption of the natural vegetative products containing phytoestrogens which tend to counteract an estrogen.
7. Avoid hormonal medicines if at all probably.
8. Investigate natural measures on birth rate regulation.
9. Nurse the babies while you can.
The modern life represents many elections, freedom and the rights. peredelyvanie the child transferring, however, is a choice which is not without consequences. Women should know and take steps necessary to make sure elections, they are able to manage not, also bring with them the increased risk of serious modern illnesses.
The reference:
Zeneca Pharaceuticals. An insert of Patient Tamoksifena. Zeneca, Inc. Wilmington, Delaware. 1998.
For the further reading, or behind the additional information about, doctor Wysong and Corporation Wysong please visit www.wysong.net or write wysong@wysong.net. For resources on more healthy products for people, including snack, and grain cereals of a breakfast please visit www.cerealwysong.com. |
|
| About the Author |
|
Dr. Wysong - the former veterinary clinical physician and the surgeon, the teacher of college in human anatomy, physiology and a life origin, the inventor numerous medical, surgical, food, sports and suitability and device products, the director of research of the existing company its name and the founder of philanthropic Institute Wysong. He is an author of the Contradiction of Development of creation now in its twentieth press, new two sets of volume on philosophy to live the named Intellectual Affairs: the Life With 1 residing... As though Intellectual Affairs; 2 - the Big Questions... As though Intellectual Affairs, some books on food, prevention and health for people and animals and more than 18 years of monthly newsletters of health. With it it is possible to communicate in Wysong@Wysong.net, and the free subscription to E-health his letter is accessible in http://www.wysong.net. Also check up http://www.cerealwysong.com.
Article source: http://www. ArticlesTake.com/author-dr.-randy-wysong-2895.html |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
